Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Editorial | Move to ACC may mend SU's declining national reputation

Published: Saturday, October 1, 2011

Updated: Sunday, October 2, 2011 23:10

The university's move to the Atlantic Coast Conference from the Big East conference will increase Syracuse University's exposure in the Southeast. The exposure will aid SU's recruitment efforts in new geographic areas, but underscores a need to complement recruiting with real academic improvements.

Representatives from Boston College said the Northeast school experienced an increase in applications from the Southeast, though that was not a motivation for joining the ACC in 2004. SU's move to the ACC may mend some of the recent blows to its academic reputation and certainly highlights its need to do just that.

Schools in the ACC cover a greater area of the United States and are primarily located in the South. Television coverage of SU games will also increase as a result of the move to the ACC. These two factors could attract a greater number of applications from the Southeast, experts say. This predicted increase in applicants goes hand in hand with other academic recruitment efforts. SU has focused its recruitment on this portion of the United States because more college-bound students will be graduating in the Southeast than the Northeast in the coming years.

Despite the expansion of its recruitment efforts, SU has received several blows to its reputation in recent years. U.S. News and World Report ranks SU No. 62 in college rankings, a drop from No. 40 in the late ‘90s. It voluntarily pulled out of the prestigious Association of American Universities before getting forced out last spring and has focused less on raising money for academics and faculty relative to almost every other fundraising effort.

SU's declining national reputation may be healed in part by the move to the ACC. SU has had traditionally little name recognition outside of the Northeast. This is changing thanks to recruitment efforts. But SU's future exposure in games against schools with enormous fan bases like the Tarheels of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the Blue Devils of Duke University will greatly expand the SU brand.

High school upperclassmen with no prior knowledge of SU will put significant weight into SU's relatively low U.S. News ranking and high acceptance rate. But students who grew up rooting against, or for, SU in games and hearing the name tossed around by friends and relatives will be far more likely to overlook otherwise discouraging figures.

Schools in the ACC have relationships that could greatly benefit SU students, particularly those with international interests. ACC member schools participate in the International Academic Collaborative, which brings together study abroad and research opportunities among the institutions. SU's already thriving abroad program could become even more renowned as part of these cooperative relationships.

Overall, the move to the ACC, where SU sits below the average U.S. News ranking of No. 49 among member colleges, should motivate SU to revitalize its national reputation. If SU's administration believes the more competitive schools of the ACC are more in line with SU's academic profile, then it should work to make that notion a reality.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

CW
Fri Oct 7 2011 10:24
Good thoughts 'L'. The Univ of GA (and a few other schools) gives sizeable tuition breaks to ANY and ALL students based on HS grades / scores, and once in UGA will continue these breaks based on GPA. It's race blind and financial-need blind. What happened? The calibur of the students applying to and staying at UGA shot-up significantly over the past 5+ years. And so did UGA's college ranking and rating. Now UGA is attracting more and better students of all races, with admission stats strong and increasing. Unlike SU's engineered diversity approach... to give big tuition breaks and reduce admission standards based on race and poverty. And no $ incentive to attract that top GPA / SAT white HS student! So, where is he/she going to go? Not SU. And SU's admission stats and reputation continue to fall each year. Nice work Nancy!
L
Thu Oct 6 2011 17:39
I like this article. I agree with CW. The push for diversity needs to stop, Nancy.The most qualified kids are the ones who should be admitted here, not the most diverse kids, I think it's damaging the school's reputation, as clearly seen over the last few years in the declining rankings. I don't believe that a kid should be admitted to a school just to help diversify the school, they should be admitted because they meet the academic qualifications. I hope that the ACC helps to publicize SU more to the southeast and that current high school kids will just be more inclined to at least consider this as a possible choice. There will be qualified students in that bunch that hopefully SU admits over kids that may just be an attempt at further diversification. SU really needs to make stricter cut offs for the kids that they choose to admit. That will raise our rankings back up.
Anonymous
Tue Oct 4 2011 08:00
Huh. I did things the wrong way. I was looking at the school's reputation for academic achievement, not it's sports standing to choose which college I earned my degree. Just because SU has a wider range to reach prospective students doesn't mean it will necessarily accept the best students.
CW
Mon Oct 3 2011 08:56
SU's declining reputation has a very clear cause...Nancy! Her push for engineered diversity and admitting 'unqualifed' urban poor kids (almost all black or hispanic) has clearly lowered SU's SAT, GPA, and 'top 10% of HS class' admission stats. It looks like SU is in the bottom 25% of SAT scores in the ACC and falling! Hence the lower US NEWS ranking every year, while other schools are rising. Nice work Nancy! Instead of making admission race-blind, and pulling-in the best students... you are essentially watering-down the quality of SU students and frankly being racist by having very different SAT and GPA's standards based on race. Think it's only a small difference? Nope, I worked for SU... I saw the admission stats, which were MUCH lower for minorities. The SU Board should sack her immediately! However, she does get some credit for the move to the ACC.
Anonymous
Mon Oct 3 2011 06:34
Excellent editorial. If you'd like to see what's happening to SU lately, see the article "Syracuse Slides" in today's Chronicle of Higher Education.






log out